By Helen Vendler
Poetry has frequently been thought of an irrational style, extra expressive than logical, extra meditative than given to coherent argument. And but, in all of the 4 very diverse poets she considers the following, Helen Vendler finds a method of pondering in operation; even if they might favor various capacity, she argues, all poets of any worth are thinkers.
The 4 poets taken up during this volume--Alexander Pope, Walt Whitman, Emily Dickinson, and William Butler Yeats--come from 3 centuries and 3 countries, and their varieties of pondering are typically idiosyncratic. Vendler indicates us Pope acting as a satiric miniaturizer, remaking in verse the shape of the essay, Whitman writing as a poet of repetitive insistence for whom considering needs to be through rethinking, Dickinson experimenting with plot to represent life's unfolding, and Yeats pondering in photographs, utilizing montage in lieu of argument.
With generic lucidity and spirit, Vendler lines via those poets' strains to discover facts of proposal in lyric, the silent stylistic measures representing adjustments of brain, the condensed energy of poetic considering. Her paintings argues opposed to the aid of poetry to its (frequently well-worn) subject matters and demonstrates, as a substitute, that there's regularly in admirable poetry a strenuous strategy of considering, obtrusive in an evolving style--however historic the theme--that is strong and unique.
Read or Download Poets Thinking: Pope, Whitman, Dickinson, Yeats PDF
Similar Criticism Theory books
This e-book presents an perception to the cultural paintings concerned with violence at sea during this interval of maritime background. it's the first to contemplate how 'piracy' and representations of 'pirates' either form and have been formed by means of political, social and non secular debates, displaying how attitudes to 'piracy' and violence at sea have been debated among 1550 and 1650.
The 1st booklet to ascertain Elizabeth I as a discovered princess, discovered Queen examines Elizabeth's personal demonstrations of erudition along literary works produced by means of such political luminaries as Sir Philip Sidney and Robert Devereux, earl of Essex.
Kari Weil presents a severe creation to the sphere of animal reports in addition to an appreciation of its exciting acts of destabilization. reading genuine and imagined confrontations among human and nonhuman animals, she charts the presumed strains of distinction among people and different species and the non-public, moral, and political implications of these limitations.
During this vital and arguable ebook, certainly one of our major literary theorists offers a big philosophical assertion concerning the which means of literature and the form of literary texts. Drawing on works by means of the Russian writers Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, and Chekhov, via different writers as different as Sophocles, Cervantes, and George Eliot, through thinkers as various as William James, Mikhail Bakhtin, and Stephen Jay Gould, and from philosophy, the Bible, tv, and masses extra, Gary Saul Morson examines the relation of time to narrative shape and to a moral size of the literary event.
Extra resources for Poets Thinking: Pope, Whitman, Dickinson, Yeats
Smith (1905), reissued with a preface through Howard generators (Bristol: Bristol Classical Press, 1980), one hundred twenty. four. For my makes an attempt to regard Stevens as whatever except a poet versifying principles, see my On prolonged Wings: Wallace Stevens’ Longer Poems (Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard college Press, 1969) and Wallace Stevens: phrases selected out of wish (Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard collage Press, 1984). 1. Alexander Pope pondering 1. Pope released the Essay on guy in components over the process a yr: Epistle I in February of 1733, Epistles II and III in March and April of an analogous 12 months; Epistle IV in January of 1734. 2. The panel consisted of Professors Hilary Putnam, Judith Shklar, and Melvin Konner. in simple terms chosen papers from the English Institute are released, and those weren't. in addition, the unique papers are lacking from the English Institute Archive (Box 2) within the Harvard collage records (as are many different essays by means of participants, now not all of which have been given to the documents next to delivery). i haven't tried to retrieve the unique papers, yet i don't think I misrepresent their conclusions. George Rousseau’s 1972 essay “On examining Pope,” in Peter Dixon, ed. , Writers and Their historical past: Alexander Pope (Ohio college Press, 1972, 1– 59), says confidently that Pope’s “mighty themes—virtue, vice, corruption, satisfaction, real as opposed to perfunctory artwork, freedom, the legislation, to say a few—are now the perpetual speak of social and traditional scientists in addition to poets and critics” (3). however it isn't by way of his themes—or dialogue of them as such through “social and ordinary scientists . . . poets and critics”—that a poet lives, yet via dialogue of the recent demeanour of being and illustration that he has elicited from language. As Leopold Damrosch observes within the Imagina- Notes to web page eleven 123 tive global of Alexander Pope (Berkeley: collage of California Press, 1987, 139): “If the historical past of principles is permitted to regard recommendations as fundamental and lived adventure as secondary, then it heavily distorts what it stories. ” Damrosch fees Carl Schorske as asserting, “Historians were too lengthy content material to exploit the artifacts of excessive tradition as mere illustrative reflections of political or social advancements, or to relativize them to ideology,” to which Damrosch provides, “It will be ironic if literary students have been to regard literature in ways in which historians deplore as reductive” (11). three. such a lot modern critics of the Essay are involved to maintain, ultimately, the price of the “ideas” within the poem. Douglas White, in Pope and the Context of Controversy: The Manipulation of rules in “An Essay on guy” (Chicago: collage of Chicago Press, 1970), makes the attention-grabbing stream of suggesting that Pope usually expects his viewers to grasp the arguments he's assisting or refuting. White concedes the presence of wit (“This part of wit has seldom if ever been emphasised in commentaries at the Essay”) and mentions “the fluid, cajoling, and regularly virtually chatty tone of the poem”; he provides that “the lugubriousness of the skin subject material may possibly conceal the witty, bantering part of the poem from a twentieth-century viewers” (9–10).